Job boards and in-house hiring
Full control, and the person is yours.
Months of sourcing, and a US salary plus benefits.
You have a recruiter, a budget, and time.
Currently available· Remote · GMT−6
Most US teams do not have a developer problem — they have a distance problem. The engineer is cheap and eight hours away, or close and out of budget. Costa Rica sits at UTC−6 and does not change clocks, which makes it one of the few places that can be both.
Full control, and the person is yours.
Months of sourcing, and a US salary plus benefits.
You have a recruiter, a budget, and time.
Fast, and cheap to try.
You do all the screening, and continuity is nobody's problem but yours.
A small, well-defined piece of work.
Scale on demand, one invoice.
A time zone eight hours away, and a team you did not choose.
Volume work that survives a handoff between shifts.
Your working day, people you interviewed, one person accountable.
Smaller pool than offshore — this is not where you hire forty people at once.
You want a team that behaves like part of your own.
Costa Rica does not change its clocks. The country sits at UTC−6 all year, which means the overlap with a United States team is never worse than two hours in either direction — and for most of the country, it is one hour or none at all.
That is the whole argument, and it is a bigger one than it sounds. A team eight time zones away communicates in handoffs: you write it down at night, they answer it while you sleep, and every misunderstanding costs a day. A team an hour away just asks.
| Your team is in | Mar – Nov | Nov – Mar |
|---|---|---|
| Chicago · Austin | 1 hour ahead | Same time |
| New York · Miami | 2 hours ahead | 1 hour ahead |
| Denver | Same time | 1 hour behind |
| San Francisco · Los Angeles | 1 hour behind | 2 hours behind |
Offsets relative to Costa Rica, which stays at UTC−6 year-round.
The rest follows from geography. Engineers here work in English — decades of multinational engineering operations in the country made that normal rather than exceptional. Contracts, invoicing and travel are straightforward. And the cultural distance to a US product team is small enough that nobody has to translate intent, only language.
I write about the country, the work, and what it is actually like to run engineering from here on the blog.
Not a wish list. The three things this person has to be able to do in their first quarter, and what the team around them already covers.
I hire from the market I actually live in, and I do the technical screening myself. You see a short list of people I would be willing to work with, not a spreadsheet of résumés.
A scoped, paid piece of real work before anyone commits to a long contract. It tells you far more than an interview loop does, and it respects the candidate's time.
They join your rituals, your repositories, and your on-call. I stay close enough to fix a bad fit quickly, which is the failure mode that actually costs money.
Looking for one contractor on a defined project instead? That is the services page.
It depends on what you are optimizing for. In-house hiring gives you the most control and costs the most time and money. Marketplaces are fast but leave all the screening and continuity to you. Offshore agencies scale but put a working day between you and the work. Nearshore hiring in Latin America is the middle path: a real overlap with US hours, English-speaking engineers, and a much shorter feedback loop.
Time zone and language, mostly. Costa Rica is at UTC−6 year-round with no daylight saving, so the working day overlaps with every US time zone without anyone taking a midnight call. English is widely spoken in the technical workforce, and the country has decades of accumulated engineering talent from the multinationals that have operated here.
For a single senior engineer, typically a few weeks from an agreed role definition to a paid trial. A pod of three or four takes longer — the constraint is finding people I would personally vouch for, and I would rather be slow than fill a seat.
Less than the equivalent US hire, and more than the cheapest offshore rate — which is the point. I quote per role rather than publishing a rate card, because a senior platform engineer and a mid-level front-end developer are not the same purchase.
That is usually the right way to do it. One engineer who works out tells you more about whether the model fits your company than any proposal will, and the second and third hires are much easier once the first one is embedded.
Tell me the role you are trying to fill and what your team already covers. I will tell you whether I can staff it, and how long it would realistically take.